Along with the fossil media (in this case, the evidently unedited Yahoo! news), the DNC is launching a tracking website for GOP candidate gaffes. My only question is, will it cover all 57 states? (link):
29 mins ago
The Democratic National Committee on Tuesday unveiled “The Accountability Project,” a website where visitors are encouraged to display their own recordings of Republican candidates’ bloopers and missteps on the campaign trail. The hope is to create a clearing house capably of delivering Democrats their next “macaca” momen—and put strong GOP candidates on the defnesive for a gaffe-ridden political performance much as Virginia Gop Sen. George Aleen was during his failed 2006 re-election bid.
Of course, the site doesn’t things quite that way. The site explains that it seeks to target candidates who say “one thing in Washington and another back home” and can therefore get away with statements they don’t have to answer for in either venue. “But it doesn’t have to be this way—you can make sure that this year’s elections are contested in the light of day,” the site reads. Visitors are encouraged to upload video, audio, campaign mailings, and notify other volunteer trackers of upcoming events.
Videos displayed on the site Tuesday afternoon were far from shocking. One showed Sen. Jim DeMint speaking at February’s Conservative Political Action Conference, while election-themed videos of Republican candidates in Florida topped its list of available media. Lately, video trackers themselves have been the ones making headlines. Democratic Rep. Bob Etheridge of North Carolina apologized for grabbing a self-identified student who was videotaping the lawmaker on a D.C. street and a tracker was thrown out of an event for Illinois Democratic Senate candidate Alexi Giannoulias this month.
But each new campaign tactic, of course, generates its equal and opposite reaction: Republican strategists are trying to get out ahead of the expected influx of video trackers this season. The Republican National Committee has already issued a memo to campaign staffers instructing them on how to properly deal with videographers from the opposition.
–Rachel Rose Hartman is a politics writer for Yahoo! News.
Yahoo! News also points out the “gaffe” of the Palin campaign in sending out a rough draft of an email (see above passage from Yahoo! news for what a rough draft looks like) and for Palin’s misstatement of where Ronald Reagan’s alma mater was (link):
Following in others’ grand tradition of demonstrating gaps in knowledge while addressing a university, Sarah Palin told a crowd at a fundraiser at California State University in Stanislaus last weekend that Ronald Reagan, personal hero and inspiration, was a California college graduate. She told the cheering crowd: “This is Reagan country, and perhaps it was destiny that the man who went to California’s Eureka College would become so woven within and interlinked to the Golden State.”
There’s just one problem here: Reagan went to Eureka College in Illinois from 1928 to 1932, the Alaska Dispatch reports. He didn’t move to California until five years after his graduation. There’s no Eureka College in California (though there’s a town of Eureka that has a College of the Redwoods nearby).
Immediately after her speech, a live microphone caught voices in the press area trashing the former Alaska governor, Mediate reported. “The dumbness doesn’t just come from soundbites,” one complained. The Fox affiliate owned the microphone but says their reporters did not make the comments.
Meanwhile, the Associated Press reports on a more serious recent mistake of Palin’s political organization. Administrators for her legal defense fund accidentally sent out a rough draft of an email to thousands of supporters that falsely claimed she faced “millions of dollars” in legal fees because of “frivolous” ethics suits against her. The corrected version of the email said the fees numbered in the hundreds of thousands, not millions.
Critics say several more claims in the email were not true. The email said 26 of 27 ethics violations against Palin were dismissed outright, which is false: Three moved into the investigative phase. One inquiry resulted in a cash settlement; another found that ethics had been abridged but declined to recommend legal proceedings because the charge involved the dismissal of the head of the Alaska state trooper force, who was an at-will employee of the governor.
The email also alleged that the Democratic National Committee created a website whose goal is to keep Palin out of public office — a charge that the organization says is untrue.
So Palin lost in 2008 and is not running for anything at the moment, yet every day the administration that did win and resides in the White House backpedals on campaign promises, lies, hides info from the public, and has gaffe after gaffe. But you’re watching Sarah Palin.
By the way, if the (unofficial) Palin campaign wants a 24/7 available fact-checker with encyclopedic trivia, editing ability, and grammatical genius, my contact info is available on the “about” page.